|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]王海斌** 叶江华 陈晓婷 贾小丽 孔祥海.连作茶树根际土壤酸度对土壤微生物的影响[J].应用与环境生物学报,2016,22(03):480-485.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1145.2015.09019]
　WANG Haibin**,YE Jianghua,CHEN Xiaoting,et al.Effect on soil microbes of the rhizospheric soil acidity of tea tree continuous cropping*[J].Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology,2016,22(03):480-485.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1145.2015.09019]
点击复制

连作茶树根际土壤酸度对土壤微生物的影响()
分享到：

《应用与环境生物学报》[ISSN:1006-687X/CN:51-1482/Q]

卷:
22卷
期数:
2016年03期
页码:
480-485
栏目:
研究论文
出版日期:
2016-06-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effect on soil microbes of the rhizospheric soil acidity of tea tree continuous cropping*
作者:
王海斌1; 2** 叶江华2 陈晓婷1 贾小丽3 孔祥海
1龙岩学院生命科学学院 龙岩 364012 2福建农林大学福建省农业生态过程与安全监控重点实验室 福州 350002 3武夷学院生态与资源工程学院 武夷山 354300
Author(s):
WANG Haibin1; 2**;  YE Jianghua2;  CHEN Xiaoting1;  JIA Xiaoli3 & KONG Xianghai1
1College of Life Sciences, Longyan University, Longyan 364012, China 2Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Agroecological Processing and Safety Monitoring, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China 3College of Ecology and Resources Engineering, Wuyi University, Wuyishan 354300, China
关键词:
茶树; 连作; 根际土壤; pH值; 土壤微生物
Keywords:
tea tree;  continuous planting;  rhizospheric soil;  pH value;  soil microbe
分类号:
S571.106 : S154.3
DOI:
10.3724/SP.J.1145.2015.09019
摘要:
为了解连作茶树根部土壤酸化对微生物生物量及区系的影响，以不同种植年限黄金桂茶树根际土壤为研究对象，分析茶树根际土壤pH值对土壤微生物量、微生物数量和微生物类群的影响以及土壤微生物对土壤酸度响应的敏感性趋势. 结果显示，茶树根际土壤的微生物生物量碳、微生物呼吸强度、微生物生物量氮及细菌、放线菌、氨化细菌、亚硝酸细菌、反硝化细菌、好气性自生固氮菌、好气性纤维素分解菌的数量随着茶树树龄的增加呈现下降趋势，且与茶树根际土壤pH值呈现极显著正相关（P < 0.01），而真菌、嫌气性纤维素分解菌、硫化细菌的数量呈现上升趋势，且与茶树根际土壤pH值呈现极显著正相关（P < 0.01）. 敏感性分析结果显示，不同微生物指标响应茶树根际土壤pH值变化的趋势为微生物呼吸强度（8.721 8）＞细菌（8.428 7）＞微生物量碳（7.955 2）＞硫化细菌（7.726 8）＞放线菌（5.780 0）＞真菌（4.740 8）＞嫌气性纤维素分解菌（4.065 0）＞氨化细菌（3.760 6）＞好气性自生固氮菌（2.368 3）＞反硝化细菌（2.340 6） ＞微生物量氮（2.324 2）＞亚硝酸细菌（2.219 8）＞好气性纤维素分解菌（1.772 0）. 综上表明，茶树根际土壤酸化显著影响了土壤微生物数量变化，不同的微生物指标响应土壤酸度的敏感性存在一定差异. （图3 表3 参32）
Abstract:
To explore effect of soil acidification on the microbial biomass and the flora at the root of tea tree, the rhizospheric soils of Huangjingui with different ages were used as materials, and effects of rhizospheric pH value on the microbial biomass, the number of microbe and microbial populations were analyzed. Meanwhile, the sensitivity of soil microbe response to acidification was got. The results showed that the microbial biomass, microbial respiration, the number of bacteria, actinomycetes, ammonifier, nitrite bacteria, denitrifier, aerobic azotobacter and aerobic cellulose decomposer decreased as the age of tea tree increased, which were significantly and positively correlated with the pH value of the rhizospheric soil（P < 0.01）. The number of fungi, anerobic cellulose decomposer and sulphate reducer increased as the age of tea tree increased, which were significantly and negatively correlated with the pH value rhizospheric soil（P < 0.01）. Sensitivity analysis result showed that responses of different microbial indexes to soil pH value presented microbial respiration (8.7218) > bacteria (8.4287) > microbial biomass (7.9552) > sulphate reducer (7.7268) > actinomycetes (5.7800) > fungi (4.7408) > anerobic cellulose decomposer (4.0650) > ammonifier (3.7606) > aerobic azotobacter (2.3683) >denitrifier (2.3406) > microbial biomass (2.3242) > nitrite bacteria (2.2198) > aerobic cellulose decomposer (1.7720). In brief, the acidity of tea tree rhizospheric soil had significant effect on the number of microbe, and different indexes of the microbe had different sensitivity to rhizospheric soil acidity. To explore effect of soil acidification on the microbial biomass and the flora at the root of tea tree, the rhizospheric soils of Huangjingui with different ages were used as materials, and effects of rhizospheric pH value on the microbial biomass, the number of microbe and microbial populations were analyzed. Meanwhile, the sensitivity of soil microbe response to acidification was got. The results showed that the microbial biomass, microbial respiration, the number of bacteria, actinomycetes, ammonifier, nitrite bacteria, denitrifier, aerobic azotobacter and aerobic cellulose decomposer decreased as the age of tea tree increased, which were significantly and positively correlated with the pH value of the rhizospheric soil（P < 0.01）. The number of fungi, anerobic cellulose decomposer and sulphate reducer increased as the age of tea tree increased, which were significantly and negatively correlated with the pH value rhizospheric soil（P < 0.01）. Sensitivity analysis result showed that responses of different microbial indexes to soil pH value presented microbial respiration (8.7218) > bacteria (8.4287) > microbial biomass (7.9552) > sulphate reducer (7.7268) > actinomycetes (5.7800) > fungi (4.7408) > anerobic cellulose decomposer (4.0650) > ammonifier (3.7606) > aerobic azotobacter (2.3683) >denitrifier (2.3406) > microbial biomass (2.3242) > nitrite bacteria (2.2198) > aerobic cellulose decomposer (1.7720). In brief, the acidity of tea tree rhizospheric soil had significant effect on the number of microbe, and different indexes of the microbe had different sensitivity to rhizospheric soil acidity.

参考文献/References:

1 任京辰, 张平究, 潘根兴, 宋林华. 岩溶土壤的生态地球化学特征及其指示意义——以贵州贞丰—关岭岩溶石山地区为例[J]. 地球科学进展, 2006, 21 (5): 504-512 [Ren JC, Zhang PJ, Pan GX, Song LH. Indices of Eco-geochemical characteristics in a degradation-reclamation sequence of soil in mountainous karst area: a case study in guanling-zhenfeng region Guizhou China [J]. Adv Earth Sci, 2006, 21 (5): 504-512] 2 李林海, 邱莉萍, 梦梦. 黄土高原沟壑区土壤酶活性对植被恢复的响应[J]. 应用生态学报, 2012, 23 (12): 3355-3360 [Li LH, Qiu LP, Men M. Responses of soil enzyme activities to re-vegetation in gully loess plateau of northwest China [J]. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2012, 23 (12): 3355-3360] 3 陈国潮, 何振立, 黄昌勇. 红壤微生物生物量C周转及其研究[J]. 土壤学报, 2002, 39 (2): 152-160 [Chen GC, He ZL, Huang CY. Turnover of microbial biomass C in red soils and its significance in soil fertility evaluation [J]. Acta Pedol Sin, 2002, 39 (2): 152-160] 4 Fraterrigo JM, Balser TC, Turner MG. Microbial community variation and its relationship with nitrogen mineralization in historically altered forests [J]. Ecology, 2006, 87 (3): 570-579 5 Ushio M, Wagai R, Balser TC, Kitayama K. Variations in the soil microbial community composition of a tropical montane forest ecosystem: does tree species matter [J]? Soil Biol Biochem, 2008, 40 (10): 2699-2702 6 Weand MP, Arthur MA, Lovett GM, McCulley RL, Weathers KC. Effects of tree species and N additions on forest floor microbial communities and extracellular enzyme activities [J]. Soil Biol Biochem, 2010, 42 (12): 2161-2173. 7 Lynch HB, Epps KY, Fukami T, Vitousek PM. Introduced canopy tree species effect on the soil microbial community in a montane tropical forest [J]. Pacific Sci, 2012, 66 (2): 141-150. 8 张倩, 宗良纲, 曹丹, 肖峻, 蔡燕茹, 汪张懿. 江苏省典型茶园土壤酸化趋势及其制约因素研究[J]. 土壤, 2011, 43 (5): 751-757 [Zhang Q, Zong LG, Cao D, Xiao J, Cai YR, Wang ZY. Srudy on soil acidification and its restrictive factors of typical tea garden in Jiansu Province [J]. Soil, 2011, 43 (5): 751-757] 9 Mehra A, Baker CL. Leaching and bioavailability of aluminium, copper and manganese from tea (Camellia sinensis) [J]. Food Chem, 2007, 100: 1456-1463 10 Mohammad N, Samar M, Alireza I. Levels of Cu, Zn, Pb, and Cd in the leaves of the tea plant (Camellia sinensis) and in the soil of Gilan and Mazandaran farms of Iran [J]. Food Measure, 2014, 8: 277-282 11 Zhang ZC, He XL, Li TX. Status and evaluation of the soil nutrients in tea plantation[J]. Procedia Environ Sci, 2012, 12: 45-51 12 Li W, Zheng ZC, Li TX, Zhang XZ, Wang YD, Yu HY, He SQ, Liu T. Effect of tea plantation age on the distribution of soil organic carbon fraction within water-stable aggregates in the hilly region of western Sichuang, China [J]. Catena, 2015, 133: 198-205 13 林生, 庄家强, 陈婷, 张爱加, 周明明, 林文雄. 福建安溪不同年限茶树土壤养分与微生物Biolog功能多样性分析[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2012, 20 (11): 1471-1477 [Lin S, Zhuang JQ, Chen T, Zhang AJ, Zhou MM, Lin WX. Analysis of nutrient and microbial Biolog function diversity in tea soils with different planting years in Fujian Anxi [J]. Chin J Ecol, 2013, 32 (1): 64-71] 14 林生, 庄家强, 陈婷, 张爱加, 周明明, 林文雄. 不同年限茶树根际土壤微生物群落PLFA生物标记多样性分析[J]. 生态学杂志, 2013, 32 (1): 64-71 [Lin S, Zhuang JQ, Chen T, Zhang AJ, Zhou MM, Lin WX. Microbial diversity in rhizosphere soils of different planting year tea trees: an analysis with phospholipid fatty acid biomarkers [J]. Chin J Ecol, 2013, 32 (1): 64-71] 15 邓欣, 刘红艳, 谭济才, 陈辉玲, 孙少华. 不同种植年限有机茶园土壤那个微生物群落 组成及活性比较[J]. 湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2006, 32 (1): 53-56 [Deng X, Liu HY, Tan JC, Chen HL, Sun SH. Comparison on community composition and activity of edaphon in organic tea garden o different planting life [J]. J Hunan Agric Univ (Nat Sci), 2006, 32 (1): 53-56] 16 伍丽, 余有本, 周天山, 李冬花, 冯雪, 蒋堃. 茶树根际土壤因子对根际微生物数量的影响[J]. 西北农业学报, 2011, 20 (4): 159-163 [Wu L, Yu YB, Zhou TS, Li DH, Feng X, Jiang K. Effects of soil factors on the distributions of tea rhizosphere microorganisms [J]. Acta Agric Bor-occids Sin, 2011, 20 (4): 159-163] 17 王世强, 胡长玉, 程东华, 廖万有, 李娜, 陈玲, 房江育. 调节茶园土壤pH值对其土著微生物区系及生理群的影响[J]. 土壤, 2011, 43 (1): 76-80 [Wang SQ, Hu CY, Chen DH, Liao WY, Li N, Chen L, Fang JY. Effects of adjusting pH of tea plantation soil on indigenous microbial fauna and physiological group [J]. Soil, 2011, 43 (1): 76-80] 18 Fujii Y, Akihiro F, Syuntaro H. Rhizosphere soil method: a new bioassay to evaluate allelopathy in the field [C]//Proceedings of the fourth world congress on allelopathy, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, New South Wales, Australia, 2004: 490-492 19 Han WY, Kemmitt SJ, Brookes PC. Soil microbial biomass and activity in Chinese tea gardens of varying stand age and productivity [J]. Soil Biol Biochem, 2007, 39: 1468-1478 20 Qu XH, Wang JG. Effect of amendments with different phenolic acids on soil microbial biomass, activity, and community diversity [J]. Appl. Soil Ecol, 2008, 39: 172-179 21 Lin RY, Wang HB, Guo XK, Ye CY, He HB, Zhou Y, Lin WX. Impact of applied phenolic acids on the microbes, enzymes and available nutrients in paddy soils [J]. Allelopathy J, 2011, 28 (2): 225-236 22 胡开辉. 微生物学实验[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2004 [Hu KH. Microbiology Experiment [M]. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House, 2004] 23 陆雅海, 张福锁. 根际微生物研究进展[J]. 土壤, 2006, 38 (2): 113-121 [Lu YH, Zhang FS. The advances in rhizosphere microbiology [J]. Soil, 2006, 38 (2): 113-121] 24 周建斌, 陈竹君, 李生秀. 土壤微生物量氮含量、矿化特性及其供氧作用[J]. 生态学报, 2001, 21 (10): 1718-1723 [Zhou JB, Chen ZJ, Li SX. Contents of soil microbial biomass nitrogen and its mineralized characteristics and relationships with nitrogen supplying ability of soils [J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2001, 21 (10): 1718-1723] 25 David C, Mark D, John H. Soil respiration from four aggrading forested watersheds measured over a quarter century [J]. For Ecol Manage, 2002, 157: 247-253 26 王孝国, 胡文革, 陈登稳, 路李鹏, 杨迪. 新疆艾比湖精河入湖口湖滨湿地土壤微生物区系研究[J]. 西南农业学报, 2012, 25 (3): 972-976 [Wang XG, Hu WG, Chen DW, Lu LP, Yang D. Study on soil microflora in near-shore wetland of Jinghe estuary, Lake Ebinur, Xinjiang [J]. Southwest China J Agric Sci, 2012, 25 (3): 972-976] 27 谢龙莲, 陈秋波, 王真辉, 刘小香. 环境变化对土壤微生物的影响[J]. 热带农业科学, 2004, 24 (3): 39-47 [Xie LL, Chen QB, Wang ZH, Liu XX. A review of effects of soil environmental changes on soil microbe [J]. Chin J Trop Agric, 2004, 24 (3): 39-47] 28 陈慧, 郝慧荣, 熊君, 齐晓辉, 张重义, 林文雄. 地黄连作对根际微生物区系及土壤酶活性的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2007, 18 (12): 2755-2759 [Chen H, Hao HR, Xiong J, Qi XH, Zhang ZY, Lin WX. Effects of successive cropping Rehmannia glutinosa on rhizosphere soil microbial flora and enzyme activities [J]. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2007, 18 (12): 2755-2759] 29 赵彤, 蒋跃利, 闫浩, 黄懿梅. 土壤氨化过程中微生物作用研究进展[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2014, 20 (2): 315-321 [Zhao T, Jiang YL, Yan H, Huang YM. Research advances on microbial function in soil ammonifying process [J]. Chin J Appl Environ Biol, 2014, 20 (2): 315-321] 30 李振高, 俞慎, 吴胜春, 王俊华, 潘映华. 不同氮肥对水稻根圈微生物生物量及硝化-反硝化细菌的影响[J]. 土壤, 2003 , 35 (6): 490-494 [Li ZG, Yu S, Wu SC, Wang JH, Pan YH. Effects of different nitrogen fertilizers on the microbial biomass and the population of nitrifying-denitrifying bacteria in the rice rhizosphere [J]. Soil, 2003 , 35 (6): 490-494 ] 31 张丽华, 黄高宝, 张仁陟. 免耕及覆盖对土壤纤维素分解强度和纤维素分解菌的影响[J]. 草原与草坪, 2007 (1): 5-8 [Zhang LH, Huang GB, Zhang RZ. Effects of cover and no-tillage on soil cellulose-decomposing bacterium population and cellulose decomposition intensity [J]. Grassland Turf, 2007 (1): 5-8] 32 李丽, 张锦韬, 段凤云, 周冀衡, 郭春秋, 胡海燕. 植烟土壤硫化细菌与反硫化细菌分布特点研究[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2011, 32 (2): 29-32 [Li L, Zhang JT, Duan FY, Zhou JH, Guo CQ, Hu HY. Distribution of sulfur bacterial and anti-sulfur bacterial in tobacco planting soils [J]. Chin Tobacco Sci, 2011, 32 (2): 29-32]

相似文献/References:

[1]贾志红,易建华,苏以荣,等.云南玉溪烟区轮作与连作土壤细菌群落多样性比较研究[J].应用与环境生物学报,2011,17(02):162.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1145.2011.00162]
　JIA Zhihong,YI Jianhua,SU Yirong,et al.Comparison of Soil Bacterial Diversity in Rotation and Monocropping Soil in Tobacco Growing Area in Yuxi, Yunnan, China[J].Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology,2011,17(03):162.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1145.2011.00162]
[2]郝鲜俊,洪坚平,乔志伟.沼液对甘蓝连作土壤生物学性质的影响[J].应用与环境生物学报,2011,17(03):384.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1145.2011.00384]
　HAO Xianjun,HONG Jianping,QIAO Zhiwei.Effect of Biogas Slurry on Biological Properties of Cabbage Continuous Cropping Soil[J].Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology,2011,17(03):384.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1145.2011.00384]
[3]黄安平,韩宝瑜,包小村.茶刺蛾危害后茶树挥发性有机化合物释放变化[J].应用与环境生物学报,2011,17(06):819.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1145.2011.00819]
　HUANG Anping,HAN Baoyu,BAO Xiaocun.Change in Volatile Organic Compounds from Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze Damaged by Iragoides fasciata Moore (Lepidoptera: Eucleidae)[J].Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology,2011,17(03):819.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1145.2011.00819]
[4]陈立华,常义军,王长春,等.发生和未发生连作芦蒿枯萎病土壤的尖孢镰刀菌数量、产毒能力和致病力[J].应用与环境生物学报,2015,21(02):228.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1145.2014.08032]
　CHEN Lihua,CHANG Yijun,WANG Changchun,et al.Population, toxicity and pathogenicity of Fusarium oxysporum in continuously cropped soil of Artemisia selengens with or without Fusarium wilt[J].Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology,2015,21(03):228.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1145.2014.08032]
[5]杨永,张学军,李寐华,等.微生物肥料对设施长期连作哈密瓜根际土壤真菌群落结构的影响[J].应用与环境生物学报,2018,24(01):68.[doi:10.19675/j.cnki.1006-687x.2017.03014]
　YANG Yong,ZHANG Xuejun,LI Meihua,et al.Effects of microbiological fertilizer on rhizosphere soil fungus communities under long-term continuous cropping of protected Hami melon[J].Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology,2018,24(03):68.[doi:10.19675/j.cnki.1006-687x.2017.03014]
[6]张立成,肖卫华,彭沛宇,等.稻—稻—油菜轮作土壤细菌群落的特征[J].应用与环境生物学报,2018,24(02):276.[doi:10.19675/j.cnki.1006-687x.2017.06014]
　ZHANG Licheng,XIAO Weihua,PENG Peiyu,et al.Soil bacterial community characteristics of rice-rice-rape crop rotation[J].Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology,2018,24(03):276.[doi:10.19675/j.cnki.1006-687x.2017.06014]
[7]孙平,章国营,向萍,等.茶树中莽草酸途径DHD/SDH基因的表达调控[J].应用与环境生物学报,2018,24(02):322.[doi:10.19675/j.cnki.1006-687x.2017.05014]
　SUN Ping,ZHANG Guoying,XIANG Ping,et al.Expression and regulation of the shikimic acid pathway gene DHD/SDH in tea plant (Camellia sinensis)[J].Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology,2018,24(03):322.[doi:10.19675/j.cnki.1006-687x.2017.05014]
[8]王海斌,** 陈晓婷 丁力 邱丰艳 叶江华 贾小丽 孔祥海.不同树龄茶树根际土壤细菌多样性的T-RFLP分析[J].应用与环境生物学报,2018,24(04):1.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1145.2017.10003]
　WANG Haibin,**,CHEN Xiaoting,et al.Using T-RFLP technology to analyze bacteria diversity in rhizospheric soil of different age tea tree*[J].Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology,2018,24(03):1.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1145.2017.10003]
[9]郭玉琼 黄道斌 常笑君 朱 晨 李小桢 赖钟雄**.铁观音茶树体胚发生及其内源激素变化研究*[J].应用与环境生物学报,2018,24(05):1.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1145.2017.12027]
　GUO Yuqiong,HUANG Daobin,CHANG Xiaojun,et al.Studies on somatic embryogenesis and the changes of endogenous hormones in Camellia sinensis cv.Tieguanyin*[J].Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology,2018,24(03):1.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1145.2017.12027]
[10]郭玉琼 王 仲 朱 晨 赵姗姗 张舒婷 常笑君 李小桢 傅海峰 林玉玲 赖钟雄**.茶树CSD1基因及其启动子克隆与低温胁迫下的表达分析*[J].应用与环境生物学报,2018,24(05):1.[doi:10.19675/j.cnki.1006-687x.2018.02021]
　GUO Yuqiong,WANG Zhong,ZHU Chen,et al.Cloning and expression analysis of copper/zinc-superoxide dismutase 1 gene and its promotor under low temperature stress in Camellia sinensis*[J].Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology,2018,24(03):1.[doi:10.19675/j.cnki.1006-687x.2018.02021]

更新日期/Last Update: 2016-06-25