|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]卢昌泰,李云,肖玖金,等.四川盆周西缘山地3种人工林土壤动物群落特征[J].应用与环境生物学报,2013,19(04):618-622.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1145.2013.00618]
 LU Changtai,LI Yun,XIAO Jiujin,et al.Characteristics of Soil Fauna Community of Three Plantations in the Western Sichuan Basin Border of China[J].Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology,2013,19(04):618-622.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1145.2013.00618]
点击复制

四川盆周西缘山地3种人工林土壤动物群落特征()
分享到:

《应用与环境生物学报》[ISSN:1006-687X/CN:51-1482/Q]

卷:
19卷
期数:
2013年04期
页码:
618-622
栏目:
研究论文
出版日期:
2013-08-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Characteristics of Soil Fauna Community of Three Plantations in the Western Sichuan Basin Border of China
作者:
卢昌泰李云肖玖金代宗丽
(四川农业大学旅游学院 成都 611830)
Author(s):
LU Changtai LI Yun XIAO Jiujin DAI Zongli
(Tourism College, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611830, China)
关键词:
四川盆周西缘山地人工林土壤动物群落结构
Keywords:
western Sichuan Basin border plantation soil fauna community structure
分类号:
S154.5
DOI:
10.3724/SP.J.1145.2013.00618
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为揭示人工林种植对土壤动物组成与群落结构的影响,采用手捡法和干湿漏斗法,对四川盆周西缘山地3种典型人工林土壤动物群落进行调查. 结果显示,从3种人工林共获土壤动物1 869只,分属6门11纲23目,平均密度为2.09×104 ind. m-2,其中,各人工林土壤动物密度排序为柳杉林(CF)>水杉林(MG)>楠木林(PZ),两两间均达显著水平(P<0.05). 对不同类型土壤动物进行比较,结果显示,各人工林大型土壤动物密度存在显著差异,其类群数排序为CF>MG>PZ,中小型土壤动物密度以柳杉林显著高于水杉林和楠木林(P<0.05),但水杉林和楠木林无显著差异. 对同功能种团的研究显示,枯食性、捕食性和植食性土壤动物密度以楠木林显著高于柳杉林和水杉林(P<0.05);杂食性土壤动物密度以柳杉林显著高于楠木林和水杉林(P<0.05);腐食性土壤动物密度以水杉林显著高于其他两类人工林(P<0.05). 3种人工林土壤动物群落的密度-类群指数(DG)以柳杉人工林显著高于其他两类人工林(P<0.05),均匀度指数(J)以楠木林显著高于柳杉和水杉林(P<0.05),3类人工林的Shannon指数(H’)和优势度指数(C)均存在显著差异. 图1 表7 参27
Abstract:
To understand the impact of different plantations on soil fauna is essential to achieve sustainable forest management and conservation of biodiversity. An investigation of soil fauna was carried out in three plantations on the western Sichuan Basin border. A total of 1 869 individuals of soil fauna, belonging to 6 phyla, 11 classes and 23 orders were collected, with the average density of 3 plantations as 2.09 × 104 ind. m-2. The order of density in each plantation was Cryptomeria fortune (CF) > Metasequoia glyptostroboides (MG) > Phoebe zhennan (PZ), with significant difference between any two plantations. Comparison among soil fauna of different sizes showed significant difference in macro-soil fauna between any two plantations, with the order of group number of macro-soil fauna as CF > MG > PZ. The meso-micro soil fauna density was significantly higher in CF than in MG and PZ, with no significant difference between MG and PZ. The study on guilds of soil fauna indicated that debrisophagous, predators and phytophaga soil fauna density in CF were significantly higher than that in MG and PZ (P < 0.05). DG index in CF was also significantly higher than that in MG and PZ (P < 0.05). Fig 1, Tab 7, Ref 27

参考文献/References:

1 刘彤, 胡丹, 魏晓雪, 黎明, 王恒, 周志强, 严善春. 红松人工林林下植物物种多样性分析[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2010, 38 (5): 28-29 [Liu T, Hu D, Wei XX, Li M, Wang H, Zhou ZQ, Yan SH. Species diversity of understory vegetation in Korean pine plantation [J]. J Northeast For Univ, 2010, 38 (5): 28-29, 53]
2 Abbasi S, Vinithan S. Ecological impacts of Eucalyptus tereticornis-globulus (Eucalyptus hibrid) plantation in a mining area [J]. Indian For, 1999, 2: 163-185
3 Allen R, Platt K, Wiser S. Biodiversity in New Zealand plantations [J]. NZ For, 1995, 39 (4): 26-29
4 Brockerhoff EG, Ecroyd CE, Langer ER. Biodiversity in New Zealand plantation forests: policy trends, incentives, and the state of our knowledge [J]. NZ J For, 2001, 46: 31-37
5 邓娟, 上官周平. 黄土丘陵区人工和天然油松林物种多样性比较[J]. 西北农业学报, 2008, 17 (2): 126-131 [Den J, Shangguan ZP. Comparison of the species diversity of natural and artificial Pinus tabulaeformis in hilly loess regions [J]. J Northwest Agric, 2008, 17 (2): 126-131]
6 卢琦, 赵体顺, 罗天祥, 金烈谊, 阴三军. 黄山松天然林与人工林物种多样性和林分生长规律的比较研究[J]. 林业科学研究, 1996, 9 (3): 273-277 [Lu Q, ZhaoTS, Luo TX, Jin LY, Yin SJ. Comparative study on biodiversity and stand growth regulation in Pinus taiwanensis from different origin [J]. Res For Sci, 1996, 9 (3): 273-277]
7 Yang WQ, Wang KY, Song GY, HE YR. Preliminary study on biological characteristics of degraded soil ecosystem in dry hot valley of the Jinsha River [J]. Pedosphere, 2002, 12 (4): 365-372
8 宋雪英, 宋玉芳, 孙铁珩, 张薇, 周启星. 土壤原生动物对环境污染的生物指示作用[J]. 应用生态学报, 2004, 15 (10): 1979-1982 [Song XY, Song YF, Sun TY, Zhang W, Zhou QX. Bio-indicating function of soil protozoa to environmental pollution [J]. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2004, 15 (10): 1979-1982]
9 柯欣, 骆永明. 土壤动物在污染评价中的作用、现行指标及胁迫环境下的耐受性[J]. 生态毒理学报, 2009, 4 (4): 457-466 [Ke X, Luo YM. Role and existing indicators of soil animals in assessment of soil pollution and indication characteristics from their tolerance developed under stress [J]. Asian J Ecotoxicol, 2009, 4 (4): 457-466]
10 Rusek J. Biodiversity of Collembola and their functional role in the ecosystem [J]. Biodiver Conserv, 1998, 7: 1207-1219
11 Treonis AM, Lussenhop JF. Rapid response of soil protozoa to elevated CO2 [J]. Biol Fertil Soil, 1997, 25: 60-62
12 徐国良, 莫江明, 周国逸, 薛璟花. 氮沉降下鼎湖山森林凋落物分解及与土壤动物的关系[J]. 生态环境, 2005, l4 (6): 901-907 [Xu GL, Mo JM, Zhou GY, Xue JH. Litter decomposition under N deposition in Dinghushan forests and its relationship with soil fauna [J]. Ecol Environ, 2005, 14 (6): 901-907]
13 吴奇, 汪张懿. 土壤动物群落生态功能研究进展[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2009, 15 (13): 30-31[Wu Q, Wang ZY. Progress on research of ecological function of soil animal communities [J]. Anhui Agric Sci Bull, 2009, 15 (13): 30-31]
14 杨效东, 佘宇平. 西双版纳热带森林雨季土壤动物群落组成与分布特征[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 1998, 26 (6): 65-70 [Yang XD, She YP. The character of composition and distribution on soil fauna under tropical forests of Xishuangbanna in rainy season [J]. J Northeast For Univ, 1998, 26 (6): 65-70]
15 廖崇惠, 李健雄, 黄海涛. 南亚热带森林土壤动物群落多样性研究[J]. 生态学报, 1997, 17 (5): 549-555 [Liao CH, Li JX, Huang HT. Forest soil fauna community ecology in south China tropical and subtropical zones [J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 1997, 17 (5): 549-555]
16 张雪萍, 侯威岭, 陈鹏. 东北森林土壤动物同功能种团及其生态分布[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2001, 7 (4): 370-374 [Zhang XP, Hou WL, Chen P. Soil animal guilds and their ecological distribution in the northeast of China [J]. Chin J Appl Environ Biol, 2001, 7 (4): 370-374]
17 廖崇惠, 李健雄, 杨悦屏, 张振才. 海南尖峰岭热带林土壤动物群落——群落结构的季节变化及其气候因素[J]. 生态学报, 2003, 23 (1): 139-147 [Liao CH, Li JX, Yang YP, Zhang ZC. The community of soil animal in tropical rain forest in Jianfengling Mountain, Hainan Island, China—composition and characteristics of community [J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2003, 23 (1): 139-147]
18 杨效东, 沙丽清. 西双版纳热带人工林与次森林土壤动物群落结构时空变化初查[J]. 土壤学报, 2000, 37 (1): 176-122 [Yang XD, Sha LQ. Preliminary investigation on time and space variation of structure of soil fauna community in artificial and secondary forests of Xishuangbanna [J]. Acta Pedol Sin, 2000, 37 (1): 176-122]
19 黄玉梅, 张健, 杨万勤. 巨桉人工林土壤动物群落结构特征[J]. 生态学报, 2006, 26 (8): 2502-250 [Huang YM, Zhang J, Yang WQ. The characteristics of soil animal community structure in Eucalyptus grandis plantation [J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2006, 26 (8): 2502-2509]
20 肖玖金, 张健, 杨万勤, 黄玉梅, 杨鲁, 李纪伟, 严妲.巨桉(Eucalyptus grandis)人工林土壤动物群落对采伐干扰的初期响应[J]. 生态学报, 2008, 28 (9): 4531-4539 [Xiao JJ, Zhang J, Yang WQ, Huang YM, Yang L, Li JW, Yan D. Short-term response of soil fauna community to harvesting disturbance in Eucalyptus grandis plantation [J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2008, 28 (9): 4531-4539]
21 尹文英. 中国亚热带土壤动物[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1992. 76-79 [Yin WY. Subtropical Soil Animals of China. Beijing: Science Press, 1992. 76-79]
22 尹文英. 中国土壤动物检索图鉴[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1998 [Yin WY. Pictorial Keys to Soil Animals of China. Beijing: Science Press, 1998]
23 黄玉梅, 张健, 杨万勤. 巨桉人工林中小型土壤动物类群分布规律[J]. 应用生态学报, 2006, 17 (12): 2327-2331 [Huang YM, Zhang J, Yang WQ. Distribution pattern of meso-micro soil fauna in Eucalyptus grandis plantation [J]. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2006, 17 (12): 2327-2331]
24 林英华, 孙家宝, 刘海良, 张夫道, 孙龙, 金森. 黑龙江帽儿山土壤动物群落组成与多样性分析[J]. 林业科学, 2006, 42 (4): 71-77 [Lin YH, Sun JB, Liu HL, Zhang FD, Sun L, Jin S. Composition of soil fauna community and its diversity analysis at Maoershan Mountain of Heilongjiang Province [J]. Sci Silv Sin, 2006, 42 (4): 71-77]
25 朱新玉, 高宝嘉, 胡云川. 森林草原交错带土壤节肢动物同功能种团组成及分布[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2011, 39 (3): 478-481 [Zhu XY, Gao BJ, Hu YC. Guild composition and distribution of soil arthropod communities in forest-steppe ecotone [J]. Jiangsu Agric Sci, 2011, 39 (3): 478-481]
26 赵世魁, 刘贤谦, 冀卫荣. 庞泉沟华北落叶松林土壤动物群落动态研究[J]. 山西农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2006, 26 (1): 66-69 [Zhao SK, Liu XQ, Ji WR. Study on dynamics of soil animals community of Larix principis-rupprechtii may forest in Guandi’mountain [J]. J Shanxi Agric Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2006, 26 (1): 66-69]
27 岳天祥. 生物多样性研究及其问题[J]. 生态学报, 2001, 21 (3): 462-467 [Yue TX. Studies and questions of biological diversity [J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2001, 21 (3): 462-467]

相似文献/References:

[1]李冬琴,徐雨,冉江洪,等.人工林赤腹松鼠危害的空间分布格局[J].应用与环境生物学报,2011,17(03):407.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1145.2011.00407]
 LI Dongqin,XU Yu,RAN Jianghong,et al.Spatial Distribution Pattern of the Damaged Trees by Red-bellied Squirrels in Planted Forest[J].Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology,2011,17(04):407.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1145.2011.00407]
[2]聂富育,杨万勤,杨开军,等.四川盆地西缘4种人工林土壤团聚体及有机碳特征[J].应用与环境生物学报,2017,23(03):542.[doi:2016.07003]
 NIE Fuyu,YANG Wanqing,YANG Kaijun,et al.Soil aggregates and organic carbon in four plantations on the western edge of the Sichuan Basin[J].Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology,2017,23(04):542.[doi:2016.07003]
[3]陈文静,祁凯斌,黄俊胜,等.川西次生灌丛和不同类型人工林对土壤养分的影响[J].应用与环境生物学报,2017,23(06):1081.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1145.2017.01013]
 CHEN Wenjing,QI Kaibin,et al.Effect of shrubland and reforestation with different tree species on soil nutrients in western Sichuan Province[J].Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology,2017,23(04):1081.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1145.2017.01013]
[4]家伟,聂富育,杨万勤,等.四川盆地西缘4种人工林土壤团聚体碳氮磷生态化学计量学特征[J].应用与环境生物学报,2018,24(01):112.[doi:10.19675/j.cnki.1006-687x.2017.03049]
 JIA Wei,NIE Fuyu,YANG Wanqin,et al.Ecological stoichiometry of soil carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus within soil aggregates of four plantations in the western edge of Sichuan Basin[J].Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology,2018,24(04):112.[doi:10.19675/j.cnki.1006-687x.2017.03049]
[5]葛露露 孟庆权 林宇 何宗明** 邱岭军 胡欢甜.滨海沙地不同树种人工林的碳储量及其分配格局*[J].应用与环境生物学报,2018,24(04):1.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1145.2017.10016]
 GE Lulu,MENG Qing quan,LIN Yu,et al.Carbon storage and its allocation of different plantations in a sandy coastal plain area*[J].Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology,2018,24(04):1.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1145.2017.10016]
[6]吕 倩 尹海锋 何朋俊 李贤伟** 范 川 冯茂松 刘俊杰 王艺峰.马尾松人工林目标树经营初期对土壤理化性质与植物多样性的影响*[J].应用与环境生物学报,2018,24(05):1.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1145.2017.12003]
 LV Qian,YIN Haifeng,HE Pengjun,et al.The early stage of Pinus massoniana plantations target tree s management on soil physicochemical properties and plant diversity *[J].Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology,2018,24(04):1.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1145.2017.12003]
[7]何如梦 王百田 ** 于显威 王旭虎 刘 涛 王岩松 刘 臻.晋西黄土区油松林的生长释放与生长抑制*[J].应用与环境生物学报,2018,24(06):1.[doi:10.19675/j.cnki.1006-687x.2018.03002]
 HE Rumeng,WANG Baitian**,YU Xianwei,et al.Growth Release and Growth Inhibition of Pinus tabulaeformis Forest in the Loess Plateau of Western of Shanxi Province, China[J].Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology,2018,24(04):1.[doi:10.19675/j.cnki.1006-687x.2018.03002]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
四川省教育厅项目(12ZB307,13ZA0258)和四川农业大学大学生科研兴趣培育计划资助 Supported by the Project of Sichuan Provincial Department of Education (Nos. 12ZB307, 13ZA0258), and the Scientific Research Training Program of Sichuan Agricultural University
更新日期/Last Update: 2013-08-22