|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]李毳,柴宝峰.油松叶绿体DNA间隔序列特点及系统学意义[J].应用与环境生物学报,2010,16(02):143-147.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1145.2010.00143]
 LI Cui,CHAI Baofeng.Characteristics and Systematic Significance of Chloroplast DNA Sequences of Pinus tabulaeformis[J].Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology,2010,16(02):143-147.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1145.2010.00143]
点击复制

油松叶绿体DNA间隔序列特点及系统学意义()
分享到:

《应用与环境生物学报》[ISSN:1006-687X/CN:51-1482/Q]

卷:
16卷
期数:
2010年02期
页码:
143-147
栏目:
研究论文
出版日期:
2010-04-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Characteristics and Systematic Significance of Chloroplast DNA Sequences of Pinus tabulaeformis
文章编号:
200902020
作者:
李毳柴宝峰
(1山西财经大学环境经济学院 太原 030006)
(2山西大学生物技术研究所 太原 030006)
Author(s):
LI CuiCHAI Baofeng
(1Faculty of Environment Economics, Shanxi University of Finance and Economic, Taiyuan 030006, China)
(2Institute of Biotechnology, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China)
关键词:
油松cpDNA间隔序列系统进化分子标记
Keywords:
Pinus tabulaeformis cpDNA spacer sequence systematic evolution molecular marker
分类号:
S791.255.01 : Q949
DOI:
10.3724/SP.J.1145.2010.00143
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
对全国分布区12个天然油松种群进行取样,测定了叶绿体DNA trnT-trnL、trnS-trnG、trnL-trnF基因间隔序列,分析了序列碱基组成特点及在松科系统分类中的意义. 测序结果显示,3个片段碱基序列均富含A/T,长度依次为448 bp、636 bp和421 bp,所测片段在种群水平上十分保守,没有发现具有种内鉴别意义的碱基变异. 但此片段适合于松科属间和种间的系统学分析,运用PHYLIP软件构建松科植物的邻接系统树,支持松科分为两个亚科的分类系统,拓扑结构表明松属与银杉属的关系最近. 由于叶绿体DNA序列长度适中,扩增和测序较为容易,适合作为研究松科植物系统进化较为理想的分子标记. 图2 表2 参24
Abstract:
The samples of Pinus tabulaeformis were collected from 12 populations occurring in whole China within its chloroplast DNA distribution range, and their noncoding sequences of chloroplast DNA trnT-trnL, trnS-trnG and trnL-trnF were sequenced. The characteristics of base compositions and the significance of the sequences in taxonomy of Pinaceae were analyzed by using the sequence data. The results indicated: (1) The three cpDNA sequences, 448 bp, 636 bp and 421 bp length, were characterized with a high A+T content; and (2) the alignments of the three cpDNA sequences in P. tabulaeformis were identical and conservative, suggesting that the DNA sequences were not suitable for analyzing the intraspecific relationship of P. tabulaeformis, but they were found useful for analyzing interspecific and intergeneric relationships within the family. The NJ (neighbour-joining) tree constructed by using PHYLIP software package supported that Pinaceae could be divided into two subfamilies, revealing the closer relationship between Pinus and Cathaya. Because of their moderate length and easy amplification, the three DNA sequences were considered as ideal molecular markers to study the evolutionary systematics of Pinaceae. Fig 2, Tab 2, Ref 24

参考文献/References:

1 Li N (李楠). Studies on the geographic distribution, origin and dispersal of the family Pinaceae Lindl. Acta Phytotaxon Sin (植物分类学报), 1995, 33 (2): 105~130
2 Kan XZ, Wang SS, Ding X, Wang XQ. Structural evolution of nrDNA ITS in Pinaceae and its phylogenetic implications. Mol Phylogenet Evol, 2007, 44: 765~777
3 Xiang QP, Xiang QY, Guo YY, Zhang XC. Phylogeny of Abies (Pinaceae) inferred from nrITS sequence data. Taxon, 2009, 58 (1): 141~152
4 Qiao CY, Ran JH, Li Y, Wang XQ. Phylogeny and biogeography of Cedrus (Pinaceae) inferred from sequences of seven paternal chloroplast and maternal mitochondrial DNA regions. Ann Bot, 2007, 100: 573~580
5 Gao X, Zhu YP, Wu BC, Zhao YM, Chen JQ, Hang YY. Phylogeny of Dioscorea sect. Stenophora based on chloroplast matK, rbcL and trnL-F sequences. J Syst Evol, 2008, 46 (3): 315~321
6 Havill NP, Campbell CS, Vining TF, LePage B, Bayer RJ, Donoghue MJ. Phylogeny and biogeography of Tsuga (Pinaceae) inferred from nuclear ribosomal its and chloroplast DNA sequence data. Syst Bot, 2008, 33 (3): 478~489
7 Chen KM, Abbott RJ, Milne RI, Tian XM, Liu JQ. Phylogeography of Pinus tabulaeformis Carr. (Pinaceae), a dominant species of coniferous forest in northern China. Mol Ecol, 2008, 17: 4276~4288
8 Xue XM (薛喜枚), Wang YH (王芋华), Luo JX (罗建勋), Li CY (李春阳). Application of different DNA molecular markers in genetic diversity of Picea Diert. Chin J Appl Environ Biol (应用与环境生物学报), 2004, 10 (6): 803~810
9 Liston A, Robinson WA, Oliphant JM, Alvarez-Buylla ER. Length variation in the nuclear ribosomal DNA internal transcriber spacer region of non-flowering seed plants. Syst Bot, 1996, 21 (2): 109~120
10 Halanych KM. 5S ribosomal RNA sequences inappropriate for phylogenetic reconstruction. Mol Biol Evol, 1991, 8 (2): 249~253
11 Kan XZ (阚显照), Qiao CY (乔才元), Gao H (高卉), Zhu GP (朱国萍). Secondary structure analysis on the nrDNA interna transcribed spacers and 5.8S in Nothotsuga longibracteata. Acta Laser Biol Sin (激光生物学报), 2007, 16 (3): 327~333
12 Doyle JJ, Doyle JL. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem Bull, 1987, 19: l 1~15
13 Taberlet P, Gielly L, Pautou G, Bouvet J. Universal primers for amplification of three non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA. Plant Mol Biol, 1991, 17: 1105~1109
14 Hamilton MB. Four primer pairs for the amplification of chloroplast intergenic regions with intraspecific variation. Mol Ecol, 1999, 8 (2): 521~523
15 Hall TA. BioEdit: A user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucl Acids Symp Ser, 1999, 41: 95~98
16 Felsenstein J. PHYLIP version 3.66. http://evolution.genetics.washington.edu/ phylip.html [Distributed by the author. Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, USA], 2006
17 Wang XQ, Tank DC, Sang T. Phylogeny and divergence times in Pinaceae: Evidence from three genomes. Mol Biol Evol, 2000, 17 (5): 773~781
18 Galtier N, Piganeau G, Mouchiroud D, Duret L. GC-content evolution in mammalian genomes: The biased gene conversion hypothesis. Genetics, 2001, 159: 907~911
19 Hu QP (胡启鹏), Guo ZH (郭志华), Li CY (李春燕), Ma LY (马履一). Advance at phenotypic plasticity in plant responses to abiotic factors. Sci Silv Sin (林业科学), 2008, 44 (5): 135~142
20 郑万钧, 傅立国. 中国植物志. 北京: 科学出版社, 1978
21 Li N (李楠), Fu LG (傅立国), Zhu ZD (朱政德). Studies on systematic of the family Pinaceae Lindl. Bull Bot Res (植物研究), 1996, 16 (1): 32~45
22 Hu YS, Napp-Zinn K, Winne D. Comparative anatomy of seed-scales of female cones of Pinaceae. Bot Jahrb Syst, 1989, 111 (1): 63~85
23 王伏雄. 银杉生物学. 北京: 科学出版社, 1990
24 Zou XH (邹新慧), Ge S (葛颂). Conflicting gene trees and phylogenomics. Acta Phytotaxon Sin (植物分类学报), 2008, 46 (6): 795~807

相似文献/References:

[1]张赟,赵亚洲,张春雨,等.北京松山油松种群结构及空间分布格局[J].应用与环境生物学报,2009,15(02):175.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1145.2009.00175]
 ZHANG Yun,ZHAO Yazhou,ZHANG Chunyu & ZHAO Xiuhai.Structure and Spatial Distribution of Pinus tabulaeformis Population in the Songshan Nature Reserve, Beijing, China[J].Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology,2009,15(02):175.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1145.2009.00175]
[2]李毳,柴宝峰.基于分子标记的油松种群遗传保护分析[J].应用与环境生物学报,2009,15(04):459.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1145.2009.00459]
 LI Cui,CHAI Baofeng.Genetic Conservation of Pinus tabulaeformis Population Implicated by Molecular Markers[J].Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology,2009,15(02):459.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1145.2009.00459]
[3]李善家,张有福,陈拓.西北地区油松叶片稳定碳同位素特征与生理指标的关系[J].应用与环境生物学报,2010,16(05):603.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1145.2010.00603]
 LI Shanjia,ZHANG Youfu,CHEN Tuo.Correlations Between Foliar Stable Carbon Isotope Composition and Physiological Parameters of Pinus tabulaeformis Carr. in Northwestern China[J].Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology,2010,16(02):603.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1145.2010.00603]
[4]何帆,王得祥,张宋智,等.小陇山林区主要森林群落凋落物及死木质残体储量[J].应用与环境生物学报,2011,17(01):46.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1145.2011.00046]
 HE Fan,WANG Dexiang,ZHANG Songzhi,et al.Reserves of Litter and Woody Debris of Two Main Forests in the Xiaolong Mountains, Gansu, China[J].Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology,2011,17(02):46.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1145.2011.00046]
[5]姜庆彪,高露双,王晓明,等.浑善达克沙地油松树轮宽度与气候因子的关系[J].应用与环境生物学报,2012,18(03):405.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1145.2012.00405]
 JIANG Qingbiao,GAO Lushuang,WANG Xiaoming,et al.Correlations Between Meteorological Factors and Tree-ring Width Index of Chinese Pine (Pinus tubulaeformis) in Hunshandake Sandy Area, China[J].Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology,2012,18(02):405.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1145.2012.00405]
[6]李明,王树香,高宝嘉.不同群落类型油松居群的遗传多样性[J].应用与环境生物学报,2013,19(03):421.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1145.2013.00421]
 LI Ming,WANG Shuxiang,GAO Baojia.Genetic Diversity of Pinus tabulaeformis Carr. Populations in Different Forest Types[J].Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology,2013,19(02):421.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1145.2013.00421]
[7]马启翔,李伟,潘开文,等.持续碳源添加对油松和连香树林地土壤氮转化的影响[J].应用与环境生物学报,2013,19(03):426.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1145.2013.00426]
 MA Qixiang,LI Wei,PAN Kaiwen,et al.Effect of Continuous Glucose Addition on Soil N Transformation of the Pinus tabulaeformis and Cercidiphyllum japonicum Plantations[J].Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology,2013,19(02):426.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1145.2013.00426]
[8]董丽,郭东罡,段毅豪,等.灵空山辽东栎-油松林更新空间分布格局及其与地形因子的关系[J].应用与环境生物学报,2013,19(06):914.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1145.2013.00914]
 DONG Li,GUO Donggang,DUAN Yihao,et al.Spatial Distribution Patterns of Regenerating Quercus wutaishanica - Pinus tabulaeformis in Relation to Topographic Factors in the Lingkong Mountain[J].Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology,2013,19(02):914.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1145.2013.00914]
[9]李颖,上官铁梁,郭东罡,等.灵空山不同生境油松种群空间格局的地统计学分析[J].应用与环境生物学报,2015,21(01):115.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1145.2014.07032]
 LI Ying,SHANGGUAN Tieliang**,GUO Donggang,et al.Geostatistical analysis on the spatial pattern of Pinus tabulaeformis population at different habitats in Lingkong Mountain[J].Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology,2015,21(02):115.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1145.2014.07032]
[10]何如梦 王百田 ** 于显威 王旭虎 刘 涛 王岩松 刘 臻.晋西黄土区油松林的生长释放与生长抑制*[J].应用与环境生物学报,2018,24(06):1.[doi:10.19675/j.cnki.1006-687x.2018.03002]
 HE Rumeng,WANG Baitian**,YU Xianwei,et al.Growth Release and Growth Inhibition of Pinus tabulaeformis Forest in the Loess Plateau of Western of Shanxi Province, China[J].Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology,2018,24(02):1.[doi:10.19675/j.cnki.1006-687x.2018.03002]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
山西省回国留学人员科研项目(No. 200846)和国家自然科学基金项目(No. 30770294)资助 Supported by the Science Foundation for Return Scholars of Shanxi Province, China (No. 200846) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 30770294)
更新日期/Last Update: 2010-04-20